Sacred Feminine: A Decolonial Reading of the Indus Mother Goddess and Gandhara Hariti

Jalil Khan

doi:10.24260/jrd.2.1.102

Authors

Jalil Khan Sapienza University of Rome, Italy Author https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9040-9518

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24260/jrd.2.1.102

Keywords:

Indus Valley Civilization, Gandhara, Hariti, Mother Goddess, Decolonial Heritage

Abstract

This article examines the colonial and patriarchal framing of female divinities in South Asian archaeology, using two case studies: the Indus Valley Mother deity figurines and the Gandhara deity Hariti. Both types of artifacts, which are currently housed in prominent European institutions such as the British Museum, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, were often overlooked in colonial scholarship and museum catalogues. While the Mother Goddess figurines were reduced to rudimentary "fertility idols" and the Hariti sculptures were demoted to secondary mythological significance in Buddhist art, masculine figures like as the Priest-King, Buddhas, and Bodhisattvas were exalted as vital to South Asian religious tradition. This interpretive hierarchy reflects the complex interplay of colonial epistemologies and patriarchal beliefs that determined how South Asian religious traditions were represented abroad. Using a decolonial feminist lens, the study reinterprets these artifacts as essential religious icons representing feminine spirituality, protection, and fertility, contesting their erasure in colonial and patriarchal narratives. The article demonstrates how decolonial feminist readings of the Indus Mother Goddess and Hariti can restore the significance of female divinities while also contributing to more inclusive interpretations of religion, heritage, and museum practice.

References

Ashmolean Museum. (n.d.). Relief Plaque Depicting the Goddess Hariti (EA1962.42). Ashmolean Museum Collections Online. https://jameelcentre.ashmolean.org/collection/4/6739/6746/11144

British Museum. (n.d.). Fragmentary Terracotta Figure of a Female (Perhaps a Pregnant Woman) (Museum no. 1939,0619.207). British Museum Collection Online. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_1939-0619-207

Chakrabarti, D. K. (2003). Archaeology in the Third World: A history of Indian Archaeology Since 1947. D.K. Printworld.

Clark, S. R. (2003). Representing the Indus Body: Sex, Gender, Sexuality, and the Anthropomorphic Terracotta Figurines from Harappa. Asian Perspectives, 42(2), 304–328.

Conkey, M., & Gero, J. (1991). Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20, 411–437.

DeCaroli, R. (2004). Haunting the Buddha: Indian popular Religions and the Formation of Buddhism. Oxford University Press.

Errington, E. (2017). The Charles Masson Archive: British Library and British Museum Studies in Archaeology, 8. British Museum.

Errington, E., & Cribb, J. (1992). The Crossroads of Asia: Transformation in Image and Symbol in the art of Ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan. Ancient India and Iran Trust.

Foucher, A. (1905–1922). L’art Gréco-bouddhique du Gandhâra (Vols. 1–3). Imprimerie Nationale.

Gupta, N. (2010). Colonial archaeology in South Asia: The Legacy of Sir Mortimer Wheeler. European Journal of Archaeology, 13(1), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1179/eja.2010.13.1.135

Huntington, S. L. (1985). The art of ancient India: Buddhist, Hindu, Jain. Weatherhill.

Karp, I. (2012). Exhibiting cultures: The poetics and politics of museum display. Smithsonian Institution Press.

Kenoyer, J. M. (1998). Ancient cities of the Indus Valley Civilization. Oxford University Press.

Lahiri, N. (2000). Archaeology and identity in Colonial India. Antiquity, 74, 687–692.

Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x

Mackay, E. J. H. (1938). Further Excavations at Mohenjo-daro. Government of India Press.

Marshall, J. (1931). Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization (Vols. 1–3). Arthur Probsthain.

Marshall, J. (1951). Taxila: An Illustrated Account of Archaeological Excavations Carried out at Taxila. Cambridge University Press.

Meskell, L. (1995). Goddesses, Gimbutas, and “New Age” archaeology. Antiquity, 69(262), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00064310

Metropolitan Museum of Art. (n.d.). Seated Mother Goddess. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Collection. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/61085

Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-colonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275

Pels, P. (1997). The Anthropology of Colonialism: Culture, History, and the Emergence of Western Governmentality. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 163–183.

Péri, N. (1917). Hârîtî, la Mère-de-démons. Bulletin de L’École Française D’Extrême-Orient, 17, 1–102.

Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.

Simpson, M. (2009). Museums and Restorative Justice: Heritage, Repatriation and Cultural Education. Museum International, 61(1–2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0033.2009.01669.x

Smith, F. M. (2006). Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still More Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India—By Gregory Schopen. Religious Studies Review, 32(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0922.2006.00047_1.x

Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.

Vidale, M. (2000). The Archaeology of Indus Crafts: Indus Craftspeople and Why We Study Them. IsIAO.

Wright, R. P. (2010). The Ancient Indus: Urbanism, Economy, and Society. Cambridge University Press.

Zwalf, W. (1996). A Catalogue of the Gandhara Sculpture in the British Museum (Vols. 1–2). British Museum Press.